Natalie feeling a little run down this morning. I think she had low-grade fever last night. Thought maybe she was teething (that is a joke and the standard answer I give her when she runs a fever with no other symptoms). So we used the Four-Faced Buddha to help. Four-Faced Frank was originally facing Sad Sack, but I see she rotated to Angry Dude.
You find these four-faced Buddhas's everywhere right now in Shanghai. Fake market, luxury stores, furniture stores, and Dongatai Lu is just silly with them in every stall! So of course I had to get one. But then I started wondering why these are so popular nowadays? You used to see the Laughing Buddha ( 布袋; pinyin: Bùdài) everywhere but he seems to be replaced by this more "utility" Buddha? I mean if I can use the Buddha not just for Ready for an insight into how complicated "Buddhist" culture is here in China? Did you know that the worship of this particular Buddha is quite common by nin-mainland Chinese in Macau, Hong Kong, and especially Taiwen? The Buddha is actually the Thai representation of the Hindu god Brahma. (yes stole that from Wikipedia). In Thailand is is referred to as Phra Phrom. However a little research indicates that current popularity is probably due to the XUAN TIAN SHANG DI 玄天上帝 popularity in Taiwen. The Shanghai temple (sorry, couldn't find the name, just the description) is actually considered Taoist. The Laughing Buddha, much more of a Chinese Culture Buddha, who generally represents "contentment" seems to have been replaced by a deity representing "prosperity to industry". That is a very interesting shift (indicated by foreign shopping zone stock). Of course, there is no easy answer as to "why is the four-faced Buddha so popular" but perhaps it is simply due to the number of foreigners purchasing it from cheap icon stalls thinking it represents ancient Chinese culture (it doesn't) and Chinese shoppers purchasing thinking it represents ancient non-Chinese culture (it does). Or it could really represent a deep shift in Chinese Culture from peasant contentment to industrial greed? I guess we won't know the answer to that before I get my sea shipment, so Four-Faced Frank will get a spot in the new house.
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Daily Picture Grade 4 - Day 89
Last day of school before Chinese New Year. Natalie is holding the hóngbāo (红包) that she will give this morning to Ayi's that ride the school bus with her and for the driver of the school bus. Hóngbāo means red envelope and is very common to see during CNY time. The red is to symbolize good luck and the envelope part is to hold money. Most workers in China will receive a hóngbāo with about a month's salary and it is considered a "bonus". This includes our Ayi and Driver as we are their employer. We will give them their envelopes tomorrow. Her caption is loosely translated as Good Luck and Prosper or gōng xǐ fā cái in pinyin. I realized that I have never really posted a lot about Chinese New Year and the traditions. Since we are here in town for a few more days, I'll try to post some more information!
![]() |
| " 恭喜发财" |
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Ayi's Grandson's 100 Days Pcitures
![]() |
| 100 Days |
![]() |
| The violin to make him look sophisticated! |
So, thought I would share these. Enjoy!!
![]() |
| Funny that they would choose a gangster look! |
![]() |
| This is just cute! |
![]() |
| Why earmuffs? |
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Chinese Baby Drivers?
We used to joke about drivers in China being "baby drivers" since most families have not been driving for generations. But this takes it to a new level! Highly possible this is faked, but it is awesome, isn't it!
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
How Many Repairman does it Take to Repair a Fridge in China?
Our Management Office was contacted Monday morning regarding our broken fridge. They could not get anyone here until today after 12:30. The repair man showed up at 2:30, but he was a GE repairman and our fridge is a Haier. So, after 30 seconds, he left. Ayi then contacted a number that the mgmt office gave her for Haier repairs. New repairman came and determined that there was in fact a problem. (Thank goodness I didn't throw all that stuff away for no reason!!) But turns out that the company is not an official Haier repair office and their prices are 20% more than the Haier repairmen (our landlord is coordinating at this point). So, he went away. Now waiting on third repairman (by 6:00) to come and actually repair the fridge. I am ordering New York Deli and opening another bottle of wine...
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Tiger cub? You decide.
Say you what you want about the Tiger Mom, but damn her daugheris smart...
http://tigersophia.blogspot.com/2011/06/well-look-what-cat-dragged-in.html
http://tigersophia.blogspot.com/2011/06/well-look-what-cat-dragged-in.html
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Shanghai Scrap » Fact-checking the New York Times’ China Coverage [UPDATED]
Funny in that I read the original article in the NYT on Monday. Thought we all (in China or beyond) could stand to be reminded that shoddy journalism does in fact pervade throughout the world.
Shanghai Scrap » Fact-checking the New York Times’ China Coverage [UPDATED]And for an article about why Adam thinks this important to talk about, read here.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
(I am posting an article that Tom sent out recently in email. Very interesting!)
David Yang, China Purchasing Manager, recently told be the historical significance of Maotai – a specific brand of Baijiu. Since I am intrigued with the Chinese culture, I did a little research on the subject. Following is the 1st of 2 articles I will forward. This article is rather long but very interesting as it relates to the historic President Nixon visit to China 39 years ago. I have color coded the text that pertains to the Maotai for those who want to skip ahead (or were alive when this historical event occurred and don’t need to relive it)
Close calls with alcohol, chopsticks, panda diplomacy, and other moments from a colorful turning point in history.
President Richard Nixon and Chairman Mao Tse-tung were well aware that they were making history.
Both understood that Nixon’s February 1972 visit to China was important for its symbolism. It was the first visit of an American president to that country—an end to the long standoff where neither nation had recognized the other.
The first night of the visit, Prime Minister Chou En-lai invited Nixon to a banquet at the Great Hall of the People, a monstrous Stalinist structure that ran along one side of Tiananmen Square.
At the Great Hall, the Americans—from the President and Mrs. Nixon to the crew of their aircraft—walked into an enormous lobby, where Chou En-lai and his colleagues waited to greet them. Chairman Mao did not come out to such occasions.
Guests made their way up a grand staircase for photographs, then were ushered into a somber hall filled with round tables and decorated with Chinese and American flags. A Chinese military band started a medley of American folk songs. In imperial China, officials had always believed in using music to soothe visiting barbarians.
Mao had apparently approved the guests on the Chinese side. While there were representatives from the Beijing revolutionary committee—one of the organs created during the Cultural Revolution—none of the leading radicals was present. Even Mao’s wife, Jiang Qing, was absent. She later told the Nixons she had been ill.
The band played the Chinese and US national anthems, and the banquet began. The Nixons and top-ranking Americans sat with Chou En-lai at a table for 20; everyone else was at tables of ten. Each person had an ivory place card embossed in gold English and Chinese characters and chopsticks engraved with his or her name.
The Americans had been briefed on how to behave at Chinese banquets. Everyone had been issued chopsticks and urged to practice ahead of time. Nixon had become reasonably adept, but national-security adviser Henry Kissinger remained hopelessly clumsy. CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite shot an olive into the air.
As the band played “Oh! Susanna,” “Turkey in the Straw,” and that Cultural Revolution favorite “Sailing the Seas Depends on the Helmsman,” waiters brought dish after dish. Nixon—who had once ordered a White House banquet timed by stopwatch and had been delighted when it came in under an hour—had no complaints as the two former enemies celebrated a new relationship and the American networks covered it live for four hours.
The lazy Susans spun, laden with duck slices with pineapple, three-colored eggs, carp, chicken, prawns, shark fin, dumplings, sweet rice cake, fried rice, and in a nod toward Western tastes, bread and butter.
Some of the Americans—including John Holdridge, at the time a member of the National Security Council’s East Asia staff—spoke Chinese, and a few of the Chinese spoke English. Otherwise, conversation was through interpreters. Nixon and Chou En-lai exchanged desultory remarks through Mao’s favorite interpreter. Secretary of State William Rogers told long stories about his hero, golfer Sam Snead, to the Chinese foreign minister, a tough old revolutionary who had no idea what golf was. Mrs. Nixon asked her Chinese hosts such questions as how many children they had.
Chou En-lai, who was smoking Chinese cigarettes, turned to Mrs. Nixon and gestured to the picture of two pandas on the package. “We will give you two,” he said.
According to Chinese sources, Mrs. Nixon screamed with joy.
Although the Americans had dropped hints, the Chinese had been noncommittal on the pandas. The exchange of presents has always been important in diplomacy, and giving the right gifts—not too lavish, not too simple—has been an art the Chinese excelled at.
In imperial China, the emperors sent gifts—silks, brocades, porcelain—to other rulers as a mark of favor and to keep them quiescent. Communist China continued to send such gifts abroad—but now, as an indication of its revolutionary nature, to peoples, not rulers. In special cases, it also sent pandas, just as its predecessors had. Placid bears that spend most of their time eating or sleeping, pandas were perhaps meant to signal a peaceful relationship.
Empress Wu sent a pair to the emperor of Japan in the seventh century, and Chiang Kai-shek gave a pair to the United States during the Second World War. After 1949, the Communist Party sent pandas to the Soviet Union and North Korea as marks of friendship. Ling-Ling and Hsing-Hsing were now destined for the National Zoo in Washington.
The presents issue had caused anxiety in the White House, regarding both what to expect from the Chinese and what to give them. On Kissinger’s secret trip, in July 1971, he had taken along a piece of rock brought back from the moon by American astronauts. The Chinese had received it much as the Qianlong emperor had received British woolens brought by Lord Macartney—with a certain amount of disdain.
This time, the idea of giving medals in Lucite was considered and dropped. Finally, ceramic models of American birds were made for senior Chinese officials, while more junior ones got silver bowls, cigarette lighters, or cuff links with the presidential seal. Nixon also presented a pair of musk oxen and two large redwood trees from California.
Each person at the banquet had three glasses: one for water or orange juice, one for wine, one for China’s famous mao-tai—“white lightning” to American journalists or, as CBS’s Dan Rather put it, “liquid razor blades.”
At their table, Chou En-lai said proudly to Nixon that mao-tai, with its alcohol level of more than 50 percent, had been famous since the San Francisco World’s Fair of 1915. Chou took a match to his cup, saying, “Mr. Nixon, please take a look. It can indeed catch fire.”
Nixon said he understood that Red Army soldiers had once drained dry the town where mao-tai was produced.
“During the Long March, mao-tai was used by us to cure all kinds of diseases and wounds,” Chou answered.
“Let me make a toast with this panacea,” Nixon said.
Kissinger aide Alexander Haig, who had tried mao-tai on his advance trip to Beijing in January, had worried about its effect on Nixon. Under no repeat no circumstances, Haig had cabled, should the president actually drink from his glass in response to banquet toasts. “At banquets,” the White House had warned, “the wine and mao-tai are for toasting only. These glasses should not be raised without toasting one of your Chinese friends.”
With Chinese sitting at each table, the toasting started early. White House chief of staff Bob Haldeman, a teetotaler, tried to explain to his incredulous hosts that he couldn’t drink alcohol. John Holdridge found himself playing an old drinking game of counting fingers with the minister of electric power. The loser had to drain his glass to a shout of “Ganbei!”
“Aided only in part by the mao-tai,” Holdridge remembered, “the atmosphere in the Great Hall was electric. Surely everyone there, and every TV watcher, must have sensed that something new and great was being created in the US–China relationship.”
From their tables at the far end of the hall, the journalists—mostly American—stood on chairs and used field glasses to see the historic scene. Nixon had wanted them there, just as he had wanted live television coverage, because he understood their power. He read the daily summaries of press coverage and filled the margins with comments and orders. He wanted the journalists’ attention but not too much; as he told Haldeman, his image should be “more aloof, inaccessible, mysterious.”
Nixon despised most journalists as “clowns” who were liberal in their bias. He was convinced they hated him “because I have beaten them so often.” Early in his presidency, Nixon ordered senior staff to prepare lists of friends and foes among the press; the list of foes was much longer.
He intended to circumvent what he saw as the liberal establishment in the media and reach out directly to Middle America. With the powers of the presidency he could make news, whether by creating photo opportunities or going on the networks with major policy statements. He could also—and did—place wiretaps on reporters to see where they were getting their stories.
The camera, Nixon believed, was more effective for him than print. As Kissinger said unkindly, “Television in front of the President is like alcohol in front of an alcoholic.”
Though Chou En-lai had suggested to Kissinger, in their discussions on the President’s visit, that ten journalists might be the right number to accompany Nixon, the Americans had negotiated the number upward until they got permission to bring about 90. When some 2,000 applications came in, the White House announced criteria for selection. Nixon himself picked the journalists, making sure the television networks got more spaces than print journalists. He took pleasure in refusing places to papers like theNew York Times. On his first trip to China, Kissinger had managed to warn Chou En-lai obliquely about talking to James Reston from the Times, who was about to arrive in Beijing.
A reporter from Newsday—who had just written a series investigating the complicated financial relations between Nixon and his banker friend Bebe Rebozo and who apparently met the criteria for going—was told “no room.” Several of the top network brass managed to get themselves accredited as technical staff, to the annoyance of the print journalists. Few of them, apart from writer Theodore White, had ever been to China.
Nixon, for all his distrust of the press, understood how important it was that his visit receive favorable coverage. With public opinion for so long hostile to Communist China, Americans still had to be convinced that their president was doing the right thing. Nixon was also conscious of his place in history.
When Kissinger made his second trip to China, in fall 1971, part of his mission was to discuss press coverage. White House staff reviewed the schedule for Nixon’s trip and checked out photo opportunities.
At the beginning of 1972, Alexander Haig spent a week in China working on the final arrangements with a party of technical experts. On February 1, an advance party of nearly 100 arrived in China to prepare for Nixon’s visit.
The Chinese expected to work with the advance team, but they were amazed by the planning. At the Beijing airport, the Americans worked out the best place for Nixon’s plane to land so that it would stop at the right distance and angle for good shots of his descent toward the reception party. The runway was measured and marked up with paint.
The Chinese had never seen a Xerox copier and were fascinated by the one the advance party brought. When the Americans realized that the Chinese were copying all their documents out by hand, they arranged to leave their copier behind.
China didn’t have the facilities to transmit to satellites or ways to ship film quickly out of the country. Nor were the Chinese media expected to get stories out fast. The senior Chinese journalist who was assigned to cover the Nixon visit remembered being struck by how quickly American journalists worked, how they used news flashes for a breaking story, and how one would write a lead paragraph and others finish up a story.
“We will have to compete in speed,” she told herself. “We will have to make some reforms in the way we do things.”
Back in the United States, the administration continued to try to add names to the list of journalists who would be arriving with the President. Some received special briefings. Beijing was cold in the winter, they were warned; many journalists rushed off to buy fur coats and long underwear. They should look after their health; if they went into a Chinese hospital, they might never come out.
Two chartered planes carried the reporters, camera crews, and their support staff, along with their briefing books and equipment, to China just ahead of Nixon. The journalists—including television stars such as Walter Cronkite and Eric Sevareid, author James Michener, and William F. Buckley Jr., a conservative the White House was wooing—traveled on one plane. Barbara Walters—then with theToday show and one of only three women in the group—was annoyed to be relegated to what was nicknamed the Zoo Plane, which carried photographers and technicians.
On the way to China, the journalists practiced using chopsticks. They played cards for the Chinese currency they had been issued. According to reporter Helen Thomas, some of her colleagues gave up drinking and immersed themselves in books and papers on China. As she said—in what was a common metaphor used by Americans from Nixon on down—visiting China was like going to the moon.
In Beijing, the press corps was housed near Tiananmen Square, in the cavernous Soviet-style Minzu Hotel. In the rooms—plainer than what most of the journalists were used to—candy, fruit, tea, and stamps had been laid out. In the bathrooms, wooden toilet seats had been freshly lacquered; unfortunately, the extract of sumac in the lacquer caused painful boils on those who were allergic to it. The advance party had already encountered what they’d nicknamed “baboon bottom.”
Partway through the banquet, Chou En-lai stepped onto the stage. Speaking through his interpreter, he welcomed President and Mrs. Nixon on behalf of Chairman Mao and the Chinese government. The President, Chou went on, was visiting China “at the invitation of the Chinese government.” This innocuous phrase had caused much difficulty on Kissinger’s first trip; the Chinese had wanted to make it look as though Nixon had asked to come to China.
The banquet, like Nixon’s trip, was about symbols, about handshakes and the exchange of toasts between leaders whose countries had for decades treated each other with suspicion. It was about status, about fears of being snubbed—as John Foster Dulles, Dwight Eisenhower’s secretary of State, had once snubbed Chou—and about losing or maintaining prestige in the eyes of the world.
It also carried echoes of the long and sometimes difficult relationship between the Chinese and foreigners. Chinese governments through the centuries had used rituals implying that their emperor had been chosen by heaven to rule the world and that all other rulers were his inferiors. Presents sent to the Chinese emperor and trade with China both were described as tribute.
It may not have been a realistic view of the actual relationships between China and foreign nations, but it was a powerful one. Inferior rulers—in other words, all those outside China—had to ask for permission to enter the emperor’s lands; they were not invited by the emperor, because that would have implied a relationship of equals.
Continuing his toast, Chou En-lai sounded a more modern note. In a reflection of the Chinese Communist view that the masses of the world would one day unite, he said that the Chinese people sent cordial greetings to the American people. Both peoples wanted a normalization of their relationship: “The people, and the people alone, are the motive force in the making of world history.”
Chou concluded: “We hope that, through a frank exchange of views between our two sides to gain a clearer notion of our differences and make efforts to find common ground, a new start can be made in the relations between our two countries.”
He lifted his glass to the Americans and Chinese in the room and to friendship between the two peoples. Coming down from the stage, Chou circled the tables of the official party, toasting each person in turn. One of the Americans noticed that he only touched his lips to his glass each time.
After a few more courses, it was Nixon’s turn. He wanted his toast to appear spontaneous even though he had been working on it for weeks. This had led to an awkward scene with Charles Freeman, his young interpreter from the State Department, just before the banquet.
Freeman, a cultivated and witty man from an old New England family, spoke fluent Mandarin. Although both Nixon and Kissinger disliked using State Department interpreters for fear they might leak information, Freeman was told earlier that evening that he would be interpreting for Nixon.
When Freeman asked for the prepared text of Nixon’s toast, Dwight Chapin, the appointments secretary, said there wasn’t one. Freeman pointed out that he had worked on earlier drafts and that he knew Nixon was planning to quote some of Chairman Mao’s poetry: “And if you think I’m going to get up in front of the entire Chinese Politburo and ad lib Chairman Mao’s poetry back into Chinese, you’re nuts.”
Ji Chaozhu, who was Chou En-lai’s interpreter, agreed to fill in, and Mao’s poetry was translated back into Chinese correctly. Nixon glowered at Freeman throughout the dinner, making him so nervous that he took up smoking again.
Two days later, after Freeman had shown his usefulness in interpreting, Nixon offered him a tearful apology and said to Chou En-lai that Freeman might well be the first American ambassador to China.
Chou muttered something that sounded to Freeman like “That’ll be the day.”
Nixon’s toast to Chou started with compliments to his hosts for their hospitality. The food was “magnificent,” as was the army band: “Never have I heard American music played better in a foreign land.” Like Chou, he admitted that there were many differences between China and the United States. Nevertheless, together both peoples could build a peaceful world, in which the young, like his own daughters, could be free from the fear of war.
“So, let us, in these next five days, start a long march together, not in lockstep, but on different roads leading to the same goal, the goal of building a world structure of peace and justice in which all may stand together with equal dignity and in which each nation, large or small, has a right to determine its own form of government, free of outside interference or domination.”
Coming to the passage that Freeman had dreaded, he quoted Mao: “Chairman Mao has written, ‘So many deeds cry out to be done, and always urgently. The world rolls on. Time passes. Ten thousand years are too long. Seize the day, seize the hour.’ ”
Nixon raised his glass to the absent Mao, to Chou En-lai, to the friendship of the Chinese and American peoples. The band struck up “America the Beautiful.” To the sound of music, the President did his round of toasts at the important tables.
“It was really quite spectacular,” Haldeman thought, watching Nixon. “He moved very forcefully, took a firm stand in front of the individual, looked him squarely in the eye, raised his glass and clinked the other person’s, took a quick sip, then he raised his glass again and gave a little staccato bow to the individual, and then he turned, marched to the next individual, and repeated the performance.”
Not everyone shared Haldeman’s pleasure. “The effect,” William F. Buckley wrote, “was as if Sir Hartley Shawcross had suddenly risen from the prosecutor’s stand at Nuremberg and descended to embrace Goering and Goebbels and Doenitz and Hess, begging them to join with him in the making of a better world.”
According to Chinese custom, the banquet ended abruptly with the last course. Guests hurried to the cars, and journalists rushed to file their stories. A famous American television reporter ran after a bewildered Qiao Guanhua, the vice foreign minister, trying to get an exclusive interview.
“I’m Eric Sevareid,” he announced to a man who had probably never heard of him.
John Burns, a Canadian journalist, took Nixon’s chopsticks as a souvenir. Although a New York dealer sent a cable with an offer of $10,000, Burns kept them.
Back at his guesthouse, a euphoric Nixon called Haldeman and Kissinger into his bedroom to go over the events of the first day in China, from the arrival to his meeting with Mao and finally the banquet. To Nixon’s pleasure, Haldeman reported that the press coverage so far had been good.
The President, Haldeman wrote in his diary, “finally decided to fold up for the day after we reviewed the schedule for the week again, and that’s the end of a very memorable day in American history.”
Monday, March 7, 2011
YuYuan Walk Pictures from Flickr
Trying out some new ways to publish my Flickr Photos. Slideshow version on blog...
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Hot Water and DVD Players
I believe that I can boil down 90% of the frustrations I have had in China IN FOUR YEARS to HOT WATER and DVD PLAYERS. We are on our 4th DVD Player and 2nd Water Heater, waiting to see if we need a 3rd Water Heater. For those of you not in the know (i.e. had to listen to me complain about this already), this past week our brand new water heater (replaced in October) is not working. Allow me to recap...
Started Tuesday night around 9 p.m. when Tom went to finish washing some dishes he had started earlier (I know, that is awesome isn't it?). Ran the hot water, but alas, only cold water! He went out with the flashlight and had to relight the pilot. He thought it might have just been windy.
On Wednesday morning, Tom had to relight at 6:00 a.m. and then wait 30 minutes for lukewarm water. After he showered and before he left for work he checked the hot water again and it was out. So he relight again and told me to hustle into the shower while the water was still warm. I took a pretty cold shower that day. Taking cold or lukewarm showers is an art that our family has had to perfect during previous episodes of the NO HOT WATER FOR SEVERAL DAYS show that seems to be broadcast several times a year in our home. Wednesday, we had the Vizcaya Management Office (they have responsibility for repair) come 4 times. And early afternoon I totally lost my cool...
Now allow me to digress to explain to anyone who does not live here nor has visited that ANY TYPE OF PLUMBING PROBLEM is cause for major concern. There is so little REAL experience with it that you rarely have a repairman that has ever even SEEN a hot water heater let alone fixed one. Combine that lack of experience with a cultural quirk that requires a Chinese repairman to assume the tenant caused the problem with magical powers and you can be assured that these types of repairs will take days if NOT weeks to get resolved.
The first trip the Vizcaya repairman made on Wednesday morning at 11:00 a.m. resulted in him relighting and telling me/Ayi that it was the wind blowing the pilot out. (Note that we have a new water heater and it has a wooden shed around it and a small wooden "cover" that sits in front of the pilot to prevent wind from blowing it out). He also told us that the temperature on the heater was too low and insisted that whoever had lit the pilot must have moved it (his attempt to accuse the tenant of using magical powers to screw something up!) Whatever. I checked the pilot every 30 minutes and it was out by 12:00 p.m. I called him back. We (had to use Ayi to translate as I was quickly running out of Mandarin) told him the problem was NOT wind and he needed to call a REAL repairman. He started insisting it was the wind. He lit it and left. Dammit. 1:30 p.m. the pilot was out AGAIN. Ayi called the Management and told them we did NOT want a Vizcaya repairman, we wanted them to call a REAL repairman. They hung up on her. Vizcaya repairman came at 1:50 pm. This time I stood outside and Ayi and I argued with him. He actually opened the shed and was showing me how the wind magically wrapped around these little gaps in the shed wall and the pilot cover and was blowing the pilot out. His suggestion was that we hire someone to come build a better cover to keep the wind out.
It was at this point that my anger, typically kept in check due to the hilarity of the situation, rose up and grabbed a hold of my brain. I started yelling English obscenities at him. I kept asking him WHY the wind was blowing it out when it WASN'T EVEN WINDY! And WHY we wouldn't just call a REAL REPAIRMEN (I actually asked for a NOT FAKE repairman as I could not remember the word for real in Mandarin). I took the silly piece of cardboard he was trying to wrap around the pilot cover and tossed it on the steps. During my rant, he refused to make eye contact and just kept talking over me like I was not speaking. In reality, I think I was freaking him out. At some point, I think I realized that there was NOTHING I could say to get this repairman to do what I was saying. I felt my anger flow into my arms and I actually considered, no fantasized about pushing him down the step he was standing on. I actually raised my arms, hands in tight fists, and leaned slightly forward to get a better angle to ensure my shove would have enough energy behind it. I now understand the metaphor "seeing red". Luckily it quickly dissipated as I realized that a repairman with a broken arm or leg would just be another delay in convincing someone that we had a problem that required a REAL repairman. I threw out one more obscenity ( good one IN MANDARIN. ) and left the scene. I grabbed my backpack and started WALKING to Concordia where in 45 minutes I would discuss with our Brownie Troop how "empowered girls can change the world". Sigh...
I had asked the Ayi to check the hot water that day at 4:30 and have them come again and relight if it was out. I was not going to be home until after 7:00 p.m. Tom also had a dinner event that night. I was pretty sure there was going to be no hot water and no resolution when I got back, but you never know! When I returned that night, I checked and no hot water. Figures. Went out and opened the shed. What I saw inside made me wish I had gone ahead with a little shove earlier in the day as it might have prevented what I discovered. There was now a weird make-shift "wind cover" in the form of three big pieces of cardboard surrounding a piece of foam that was wrapped around not just the pilot, but the whole bottom of the hot water heater! Thank God the heater was not working or our whole house might have BURNED DOWN!!!
I called Tom at his dinner and told him that someone with him that night, who spoke good Mandarin, should call the Vizcaya Management Office and INSIST that someone come. Tom told me to cool down he would take care of it when he got home. I stayed up late that night watching Season 5 of Dexter. Not sure why it is that watching such violent drama helps make my own drama less significant. Though I did jot down a few notes for future reference. (Of course that is a joke)
Thursday morning was a beautiful day. No hot water, but at this point we are all experts in quick, cool showers. Tom lit the pilot at 6:00 am, took his shower at 6:40. I jumped in at 7. Not hot, but warm enough my that my shower took 7 minutes. Thursday we got the Landlord involved. And though she was working to get a real repairman, the Vizcaya repairman came back anyway. I REFUSED to talk to the repairman. He only came once. He relit and then decided to stand and watch the light. He was going to PROVE that the WIND was doing it. He left after 10 minutes. 10 minutes after he left, the pilot was out. Tom had started to do his own research and talked to his dad, who was a propane gas man all his life and knows a thing or two about hot water heaters. Tom formulated a theory on what needed to be done and took the heater apart when he got home. Nothing seemed obvious. He put back together, but oops, it appears that the now the pilot won't relight. Tom did a bit more research and felt it was some copper tube thing that needed to be replaced (note that this blog entry is NOT about the technical problem and solution. It is just about me venting. Please read Tom's FaceBook entries if you desire the scoop on the actual problem!) In the meantime, the landlord had arranged for a more "expert" repairman to come that night at 7:00 p.m. to assess. No idea if he was from Vizcaya or not. He and Tom both agreed on the part that needed to be replaced. Alas, he did have one and wasn't sure if he could get one before Monday. Went to be early knowing that Friday morning and perhaps the weekend was going to be a pain.
Friday morning. No Hot water. Tom went to clubhouse and took a shower in the locker room. Natalie headed to school with no shower, but it was Wacky Day. I heated up water on the stove and took what we had started calling "Little House on the Prairie" bath. Practically scalded myself working out the logistics of using the boiling water. Tom decided to do the repair himself. So he sourced the part he needed at some teeny place in Puxi and sent the driver to pick up what should have been a $5 part. Turned out it was $50! He left work early and brought the part home. Took apart the heater and put the new part in. YEAH! IT WORKED! TOM FIXED IT! It lit right up and started heating. I was so happy when I got home to find hot water available. My plan was to take a LONG bath and drink a nice glass of wine. Tom had his annual dinner Friday night, so he went up to get changed. Right before he left, he thought he would check to make sure everything seemed alright. Alas, the heater was off. Poor Tom.
So here we sit, Saturday morning,4th day on the Prairie, no hot water. The landlord is trying to make arrangements to get someone here to fix it before Monday, but I have no confidence that will happen. I am debating between heading up to clubhouse or doing the "Little House" bath. Tom didn't come to bed until late so he won't be worrying about showering anytime soon. But as I sit here, I am thinking that Natalie might not have had a bath since... Well.... Since Tuesday night?
Last night was Pizza and Movie night. When we put in Season 1 of Happy Days (Natalie loves it), the DVD player started, but acted funky once in awhile. But we got through it. Sent Natalie to bed. Kiss Kiss. Another glass of wine. Back down to watch another DVD. ERROR? Watched Mad Men on the PC upstairs. Looks like we need to buy our 5th DVD Player today.
Started Tuesday night around 9 p.m. when Tom went to finish washing some dishes he had started earlier (I know, that is awesome isn't it?). Ran the hot water, but alas, only cold water! He went out with the flashlight and had to relight the pilot. He thought it might have just been windy.
On Wednesday morning, Tom had to relight at 6:00 a.m. and then wait 30 minutes for lukewarm water. After he showered and before he left for work he checked the hot water again and it was out. So he relight again and told me to hustle into the shower while the water was still warm. I took a pretty cold shower that day. Taking cold or lukewarm showers is an art that our family has had to perfect during previous episodes of the NO HOT WATER FOR SEVERAL DAYS show that seems to be broadcast several times a year in our home. Wednesday, we had the Vizcaya Management Office (they have responsibility for repair) come 4 times. And early afternoon I totally lost my cool...
Now allow me to digress to explain to anyone who does not live here nor has visited that ANY TYPE OF PLUMBING PROBLEM is cause for major concern. There is so little REAL experience with it that you rarely have a repairman that has ever even SEEN a hot water heater let alone fixed one. Combine that lack of experience with a cultural quirk that requires a Chinese repairman to assume the tenant caused the problem with magical powers and you can be assured that these types of repairs will take days if NOT weeks to get resolved.
The first trip the Vizcaya repairman made on Wednesday morning at 11:00 a.m. resulted in him relighting and telling me/Ayi that it was the wind blowing the pilot out. (Note that we have a new water heater and it has a wooden shed around it and a small wooden "cover" that sits in front of the pilot to prevent wind from blowing it out). He also told us that the temperature on the heater was too low and insisted that whoever had lit the pilot must have moved it (his attempt to accuse the tenant of using magical powers to screw something up!) Whatever. I checked the pilot every 30 minutes and it was out by 12:00 p.m. I called him back. We (had to use Ayi to translate as I was quickly running out of Mandarin) told him the problem was NOT wind and he needed to call a REAL repairman. He started insisting it was the wind. He lit it and left. Dammit. 1:30 p.m. the pilot was out AGAIN. Ayi called the Management and told them we did NOT want a Vizcaya repairman, we wanted them to call a REAL repairman. They hung up on her. Vizcaya repairman came at 1:50 pm. This time I stood outside and Ayi and I argued with him. He actually opened the shed and was showing me how the wind magically wrapped around these little gaps in the shed wall and the pilot cover and was blowing the pilot out. His suggestion was that we hire someone to come build a better cover to keep the wind out.
It was at this point that my anger, typically kept in check due to the hilarity of the situation, rose up and grabbed a hold of my brain. I started yelling English obscenities at him. I kept asking him WHY the wind was blowing it out when it WASN'T EVEN WINDY! And WHY we wouldn't just call a REAL REPAIRMEN (I actually asked for a NOT FAKE repairman as I could not remember the word for real in Mandarin). I took the silly piece of cardboard he was trying to wrap around the pilot cover and tossed it on the steps. During my rant, he refused to make eye contact and just kept talking over me like I was not speaking. In reality, I think I was freaking him out. At some point, I think I realized that there was NOTHING I could say to get this repairman to do what I was saying. I felt my anger flow into my arms and I actually considered, no fantasized about pushing him down the step he was standing on. I actually raised my arms, hands in tight fists, and leaned slightly forward to get a better angle to ensure my shove would have enough energy behind it. I now understand the metaphor "seeing red". Luckily it quickly dissipated as I realized that a repairman with a broken arm or leg would just be another delay in convincing someone that we had a problem that required a REAL repairman. I threw out one more obscenity ( good one IN MANDARIN. ) and left the scene. I grabbed my backpack and started WALKING to Concordia where in 45 minutes I would discuss with our Brownie Troop how "empowered girls can change the world". Sigh...
I had asked the Ayi to check the hot water that day at 4:30 and have them come again and relight if it was out. I was not going to be home until after 7:00 p.m. Tom also had a dinner event that night. I was pretty sure there was going to be no hot water and no resolution when I got back, but you never know! When I returned that night, I checked and no hot water. Figures. Went out and opened the shed. What I saw inside made me wish I had gone ahead with a little shove earlier in the day as it might have prevented what I discovered. There was now a weird make-shift "wind cover" in the form of three big pieces of cardboard surrounding a piece of foam that was wrapped around not just the pilot, but the whole bottom of the hot water heater! Thank God the heater was not working or our whole house might have BURNED DOWN!!!
I called Tom at his dinner and told him that someone with him that night, who spoke good Mandarin, should call the Vizcaya Management Office and INSIST that someone come. Tom told me to cool down he would take care of it when he got home. I stayed up late that night watching Season 5 of Dexter. Not sure why it is that watching such violent drama helps make my own drama less significant. Though I did jot down a few notes for future reference. (Of course that is a joke)
Thursday morning was a beautiful day. No hot water, but at this point we are all experts in quick, cool showers. Tom lit the pilot at 6:00 am, took his shower at 6:40. I jumped in at 7. Not hot, but warm enough my that my shower took 7 minutes. Thursday we got the Landlord involved. And though she was working to get a real repairman, the Vizcaya repairman came back anyway. I REFUSED to talk to the repairman. He only came once. He relit and then decided to stand and watch the light. He was going to PROVE that the WIND was doing it. He left after 10 minutes. 10 minutes after he left, the pilot was out. Tom had started to do his own research and talked to his dad, who was a propane gas man all his life and knows a thing or two about hot water heaters. Tom formulated a theory on what needed to be done and took the heater apart when he got home. Nothing seemed obvious. He put back together, but oops, it appears that the now the pilot won't relight. Tom did a bit more research and felt it was some copper tube thing that needed to be replaced (note that this blog entry is NOT about the technical problem and solution. It is just about me venting. Please read Tom's FaceBook entries if you desire the scoop on the actual problem!) In the meantime, the landlord had arranged for a more "expert" repairman to come that night at 7:00 p.m. to assess. No idea if he was from Vizcaya or not. He and Tom both agreed on the part that needed to be replaced. Alas, he did have one and wasn't sure if he could get one before Monday. Went to be early knowing that Friday morning and perhaps the weekend was going to be a pain.
Friday morning. No Hot water. Tom went to clubhouse and took a shower in the locker room. Natalie headed to school with no shower, but it was Wacky Day. I heated up water on the stove and took what we had started calling "Little House on the Prairie" bath. Practically scalded myself working out the logistics of using the boiling water. Tom decided to do the repair himself. So he sourced the part he needed at some teeny place in Puxi and sent the driver to pick up what should have been a $5 part. Turned out it was $50! He left work early and brought the part home. Took apart the heater and put the new part in. YEAH! IT WORKED! TOM FIXED IT! It lit right up and started heating. I was so happy when I got home to find hot water available. My plan was to take a LONG bath and drink a nice glass of wine. Tom had his annual dinner Friday night, so he went up to get changed. Right before he left, he thought he would check to make sure everything seemed alright. Alas, the heater was off. Poor Tom.
So here we sit, Saturday morning,4th day on the Prairie, no hot water. The landlord is trying to make arrangements to get someone here to fix it before Monday, but I have no confidence that will happen. I am debating between heading up to clubhouse or doing the "Little House" bath. Tom didn't come to bed until late so he won't be worrying about showering anytime soon. But as I sit here, I am thinking that Natalie might not have had a bath since... Well.... Since Tuesday night?
Last night was Pizza and Movie night. When we put in Season 1 of Happy Days (Natalie loves it), the DVD player started, but acted funky once in awhile. But we got through it. Sent Natalie to bed. Kiss Kiss. Another glass of wine. Back down to watch another DVD. ERROR? Watched Mad Men on the PC upstairs. Looks like we need to buy our 5th DVD Player today.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Daily Picture Project - Day 83
For those if you whose homes are not inundated with American Girl stuff, the story Mao is reading this morning is Rebecca Rubin's, Russian immigrant.
| "Chairman Mao, I heard Rebecca's family lived for a short time in the Jewish Settlement in Shanghai before immigrating to the U.S. What was your view on that?" |
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Shanghai Photo Restoration
Well, I undertook a project recently that is interesting but VERY time consuming! Several weeks ago I printed a nice collage of pictures of us (mostly Natalie!) with our Ayi. I framed it and gave it to her. She loved it so much she brought in pictures from her home of her family for us to look at together. I volunteered to scan some of them. I will write more later about these pictures as there are usually some great story that goes with them. Today, I am just showing the first one I started with, a picture of Ayi's mother and her two of older sisters. Ayi also a brother, but he is not in this picture. The picture was taken in 1955. It was not clear if this taken in Shanghai or near the "work farm" were the Ayi's family was relocated to in Jiansu province.
I took it and started to edit it in Adobe Elements. It took some trial and error! My favorite part is being able to pull out the green dragon that was on the wall behind them. I put about 3 hours total into the restoration of this and it is not a great result. But I learned a lot about cloning and blurring.
The Ayi was thrilled with the results. I am now going to get it printed for her. Her older sister in the picture, on the right, is 80 years old. Her younger sister, on the left, died not too long after this picture was taken. Ayi was born after her sister died. I will put the pics into a story starting in the next few weeks. Lots more pictures to clean up before I can tell it!
![]() |
| Original - 1955 |
![]() |
| Mostly Restored |
Sunday, October 31, 2010
Perspective: Restoring Sanity?
I am a fan of John Stewart. Anyone who reads my Facebook or blog might have picked up on that. (Hey, anyone who has Obama on his show and manages to ask real questions and still be funny deserves some respect!) Yesterday was his "Rally to Restore Sanity" on the National Mall in DC. Scam? Not sure. But he makes me laugh and think at the same time, so I was interested. Unfortunately it started at 3:00 a.m. my time so I couldn't keep up with the twitting on it. So this morning, thought I would document my search for the news on this story...
Went with twitter first as I knew the event was wrapping up. Lots of tweets. Nothing that gave me any information whatsoever. [UPDATE: Turns out I was looking at an "unofficial" hashtag!]
First of all, the Google news headlines included one from Fox which stated "'Rally for 'Sanity' Draws Insane Crowd". Fox was smart enough to find a man in a green suit supporting marijuana legalization to get a quote from. I was also happy to read that Steward appeal to a "younger generation". I suspected that that 40 was the new 20! But all in all, not too bed as of 30 minutes after the close of the Rally!
Went to the official Daily Show site. The default video was the weekly recap. Tried the link to the Rally to Restore Sanity on this site. But it was just old advertising from previous shows.
I was interested in NPR's view. They felt that the performance of the "Roots" was a high, but the lenght of the performance (40 minutes) was a low. I'm disappointed that another low as Stewart's intordouction of Kid Rock did not elicit an emotional response from the crowd. I love Kid Rock. Oh, and discovered that JetBlue flight attendant Steven Slater recorded a video, but no link to the video.
YouTube? Hundreds of videos, but couldn't find anything I wanted to watch. No current videos easily found.
Aggregation may be the way to go. Huff Post? Geesh, all about the Sanity buses. Not interested. Yahoo? Looked like Google results, just a different order...
So let me say right that I am already 30 minutes into my search for news and I have basically found nothing that kept my interest for more than 45 seconds. It took me longer to type these thoughts so far. People, this is not making sense to me! Is it possible that what is wrong with the media is me? On I go...
Went to Facebook for event. Whew, some real comments. Pictures. Yet the commentary feels oddly, well, 'Facebook'-like. Nothing very funny. Nothing really interesting. Must...move..on... Just let me check a few more status's...
On a fluke, checked CSPAN. Wow. Found news. Organized. Live feed. Official Twitter feed. Video links. Commentary that sounds like actual reality-based opinion. Finally I get my information. Excuse me while I take a break...
Ok. 20 minutes of reading and watching videos and I feel satisfied. (man, that was a long Roots performance!) Since my real reason for writing the entry today was not on the actual Rally itself, but on the channels used to find information regarding current events, I'll pass on providing my own personal commentary on the outcomes of this other than to say that the sign which read "hyperbole is the greatest threat of all time" sums up my feelings nicely. My real comment here is about the process which we as news consumers approach find out information. Granted I had little caffeine after a night of Halloweening with adult beverages. But the fact I had no official "go-to" for my information is in fact an indication of our current media environment. So today all I kept wishing I had been in DC so I would KNOW what the vibe was like and KNOW what was said. And then it hit me. Unless I experience an event live, for myself, my source of information will probably impose their own spin. I am sure that any one reading who has any political science knowledge will quickly recognize my naive comments here. I recognize American history is full of desire to speak our minds without censorship. [Note my elusive reference to the First Amendment. However this will be the last reference to the word censorship] But what do we do as a society when you have no trusting source of information? Well, we create social channels such as Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. But maybe these sources are not good mediums either. Today, they were not. Admittedly I was not searching for information on the upcoming election [insert chuckle here].
For my own sanity, I now recognize that I have to be more active in participating in events which are influencing our American rights and way of life. For myself, the real eureka moment was to recognize that inactive participation in any political topic is not going to do it for me. Media by definition will exaggerate for effect. Social frameworks support and encourage "viral" communication which is a bigger crap shoot than trying to find Fair & Balanced news on Fox. OK, so maybe the Rally was not such an influence for most of you reading. But the upcoming elections are. I'll be honest and admit that I am not voting. Voting from China is frankly a pain in the behind and since we are now nomads and claim no American State as our own, I feel no sense of urgency in voting. HOWEVER, my apathy does not excuse those of your are going to be IMPACTED by your elected officials. I challenge you all to find a way to get involved and discover the real story behind your candidates. Don't affiliate with a single party, amalgamate with all of them! Read/watch Fox, but then read/watch MSNBC. Attend a debate. Learn the names of your School Board members. Go to a local Township Zoning meeting. In the U.S. there are 89,500 local governments, including 3,033 counties, 19,492 municipalities, 16,500 townships, 13,000 school districts. How many of us know anything about this? If you don't know anything, find someone who does. GET ACTIVE!
Ok, better start actively picking up the results of last night's active participation in a party...
Went with twitter first as I knew the event was wrapping up. Lots of tweets. Nothing that gave me any information whatsoever. [UPDATE: Turns out I was looking at an "unofficial" hashtag!]
First of all, the Google news headlines included one from Fox which stated "'Rally for 'Sanity' Draws Insane Crowd". Fox was smart enough to find a man in a green suit supporting marijuana legalization to get a quote from. I was also happy to read that Steward appeal to a "younger generation". I suspected that that 40 was the new 20! But all in all, not too bed as of 30 minutes after the close of the Rally!
Went to the official Daily Show site. The default video was the weekly recap. Tried the link to the Rally to Restore Sanity on this site. But it was just old advertising from previous shows.
I was interested in NPR's view. They felt that the performance of the "Roots" was a high, but the lenght of the performance (40 minutes) was a low. I'm disappointed that another low as Stewart's intordouction of Kid Rock did not elicit an emotional response from the crowd. I love Kid Rock. Oh, and discovered that JetBlue flight attendant Steven Slater recorded a video, but no link to the video.
YouTube? Hundreds of videos, but couldn't find anything I wanted to watch. No current videos easily found.
Aggregation may be the way to go. Huff Post? Geesh, all about the Sanity buses. Not interested. Yahoo? Looked like Google results, just a different order...
So let me say right that I am already 30 minutes into my search for news and I have basically found nothing that kept my interest for more than 45 seconds. It took me longer to type these thoughts so far. People, this is not making sense to me! Is it possible that what is wrong with the media is me? On I go...
Went to Facebook for event. Whew, some real comments. Pictures. Yet the commentary feels oddly, well, 'Facebook'-like. Nothing very funny. Nothing really interesting. Must...move..on... Just let me check a few more status's...
On a fluke, checked CSPAN. Wow. Found news. Organized. Live feed. Official Twitter feed. Video links. Commentary that sounds like actual reality-based opinion. Finally I get my information. Excuse me while I take a break...
Ok. 20 minutes of reading and watching videos and I feel satisfied. (man, that was a long Roots performance!) Since my real reason for writing the entry today was not on the actual Rally itself, but on the channels used to find information regarding current events, I'll pass on providing my own personal commentary on the outcomes of this other than to say that the sign which read "hyperbole is the greatest threat of all time" sums up my feelings nicely. My real comment here is about the process which we as news consumers approach find out information. Granted I had little caffeine after a night of Halloweening with adult beverages. But the fact I had no official "go-to" for my information is in fact an indication of our current media environment. So today all I kept wishing I had been in DC so I would KNOW what the vibe was like and KNOW what was said. And then it hit me. Unless I experience an event live, for myself, my source of information will probably impose their own spin. I am sure that any one reading who has any political science knowledge will quickly recognize my naive comments here. I recognize American history is full of desire to speak our minds without censorship. [Note my elusive reference to the First Amendment. However this will be the last reference to the word censorship] But what do we do as a society when you have no trusting source of information? Well, we create social channels such as Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. But maybe these sources are not good mediums either. Today, they were not. Admittedly I was not searching for information on the upcoming election [insert chuckle here].
For my own sanity, I now recognize that I have to be more active in participating in events which are influencing our American rights and way of life. For myself, the real eureka moment was to recognize that inactive participation in any political topic is not going to do it for me. Media by definition will exaggerate for effect. Social frameworks support and encourage "viral" communication which is a bigger crap shoot than trying to find Fair & Balanced news on Fox. OK, so maybe the Rally was not such an influence for most of you reading. But the upcoming elections are. I'll be honest and admit that I am not voting. Voting from China is frankly a pain in the behind and since we are now nomads and claim no American State as our own, I feel no sense of urgency in voting. HOWEVER, my apathy does not excuse those of your are going to be IMPACTED by your elected officials. I challenge you all to find a way to get involved and discover the real story behind your candidates. Don't affiliate with a single party, amalgamate with all of them! Read/watch Fox, but then read/watch MSNBC. Attend a debate. Learn the names of your School Board members. Go to a local Township Zoning meeting. In the U.S. there are 89,500 local governments, including 3,033 counties, 19,492 municipalities, 16,500 townships, 13,000 school districts. How many of us know anything about this? If you don't know anything, find someone who does. GET ACTIVE!
Ok, better start actively picking up the results of last night's active participation in a party...
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Healthcare, Chinese Values, and What it Means to Be Middle Class
I absolutely do not have time today to be writing up a blog posting. Yet I felt compelled to share the conversation I just had with our Ayi. Ayi was off yesterday and went to the hospital with her husband (who has a bad heart!) and she was sharing a story about waiting for x-rays. We were talking about healthcare and how that process works in China. Now please keep in mind that the perspective she shared with me was not really from what think of as a "Shanghaiese" perspective. She thinks of herself as Pudongese and very different from the people in Puxi, who make up the more traditional definition of "Shanghaiese". Also, our Ayi was in Middle School and High School during the cultural revolution. So her last 4 years of school was a very different education than students before her or after her received. In fact, there are many Mandarin characters that she either doesn't know or had to teach herself as she missed much of that part of the education. But that's another story. Back to health...
She stated that every year, because she is in her 50's, she gets 500 RMB to cover her health care. She stated that as long as there is no major health issue, 500 RMB is enough to cover you. For minor issues (this is China, so don't know if minor includes losing a limb!), she would have to use her own money to pay. But she stated that within her community, this is rare. If she would have a major health issue, she can get up to another 1,500 RMB. She didn't state it explicitly, but I assume that after that, you have to cover all or some amount out of your own pocket. I explained that in U.S. we have insurance, we have high medical costs, yada, yada, yada. She wanted to know what, if anything, the government paid for. So of course I felt compelled to move us into a new subject:: socialism v. capitalism.
I used some paper to explain how in the U.S. we are mostly made up of a "Middle Class". And what you get from the government depends on how much/hard/type of work you do/did. I showed her the Chinese Character for socialism, 社会主义(Shèhuì zhǔyì). And told her that the US does not use the same type of government. [note that my blog entries are generally politically neutral, so please don't TeaBag me here] Which she knew. What then compelled me today to post this was that I was amazed at how well, a mostly self-educated Chinese could follow my simple explanations. We talked about what the U.S. was like before there was a large middle class and she could see the similarities between the two countries. We talked about how things are changing for China and about how more people are getting closer to the definition of "middle class" here. Ayi then made another observation: becoming middle-class changes your values! Aha! Absolutely.
Just as I am sure that American parents have worried over the past few generations that their children's values have changed, Ayi is now understands that her great-grandchildren may not possess the same values she has instilled into her son. She said this is not a good thing. So we talked about how as a middle-class American, Tom and I buy things that maybe our parents didn't or couldn't have. We buy our own houses, we buy our own cars, we have our own lives. I explained that for me, being a part of a middle class says that I have more choices when it comes to spending my money. We can choose to be thrifty or not. Many young Chinese will spend a month's salary to purchase and possess something that is totally impractical, but they appreciate tremendously that they now have the choice to do that. Ayi sees some changes in her son too, but was thrilled that he chose to marry a woman who will not buy Chinese Cabbage for 4RMB when she can get it at another store for 2RMB.
So, what started as a simple discussion about the waiting in line for an x-ray, turned into an enlightening exchange about what it means to be a middle class American. Enlightening? Yes, because in explaining it I realized that while many non-Americans think we are just "lucky" to live in a country which gives us so many economic opportunities, I realized it is not about luck at all. It is about choice. I can choose to keep a particular family value, or I can adopt my own. I can choose to buy something, or not. It struck me that this is NOT uniquely American, and many Chinese are experiencing the exact same opportunity, albeit for the first time and on a more limited scale. Parents here worry the same as our parents did/do in the U.S about evolving family values. I cannot imagine what my great grandmother would think about my daughter owning and wearing jewelry! We had to be 10 years old before she would even let us try her jewelery on! But I have made sure that Natalie kept the important values: polite, empathetic, independent. We made choices as parents and hope that our choices result in happy daughter. Hopefully Granny knows that I have been known to search for the 2RMB Chinese Cabbage occasionally!
She stated that every year, because she is in her 50's, she gets 500 RMB to cover her health care. She stated that as long as there is no major health issue, 500 RMB is enough to cover you. For minor issues (this is China, so don't know if minor includes losing a limb!), she would have to use her own money to pay. But she stated that within her community, this is rare. If she would have a major health issue, she can get up to another 1,500 RMB. She didn't state it explicitly, but I assume that after that, you have to cover all or some amount out of your own pocket. I explained that in U.S. we have insurance, we have high medical costs, yada, yada, yada. She wanted to know what, if anything, the government paid for. So of course I felt compelled to move us into a new subject:: socialism v. capitalism.
I used some paper to explain how in the U.S. we are mostly made up of a "Middle Class". And what you get from the government depends on how much/hard/type of work you do/did. I showed her the Chinese Character for socialism, 社会主义(Shèhuì zhǔyì). And told her that the US does not use the same type of government. [note that my blog entries are generally politically neutral, so please don't TeaBag me here] Which she knew. What then compelled me today to post this was that I was amazed at how well, a mostly self-educated Chinese could follow my simple explanations. We talked about what the U.S. was like before there was a large middle class and she could see the similarities between the two countries. We talked about how things are changing for China and about how more people are getting closer to the definition of "middle class" here. Ayi then made another observation: becoming middle-class changes your values! Aha! Absolutely.
Just as I am sure that American parents have worried over the past few generations that their children's values have changed, Ayi is now understands that her great-grandchildren may not possess the same values she has instilled into her son. She said this is not a good thing. So we talked about how as a middle-class American, Tom and I buy things that maybe our parents didn't or couldn't have. We buy our own houses, we buy our own cars, we have our own lives. I explained that for me, being a part of a middle class says that I have more choices when it comes to spending my money. We can choose to be thrifty or not. Many young Chinese will spend a month's salary to purchase and possess something that is totally impractical, but they appreciate tremendously that they now have the choice to do that. Ayi sees some changes in her son too, but was thrilled that he chose to marry a woman who will not buy Chinese Cabbage for 4RMB when she can get it at another store for 2RMB.
So, what started as a simple discussion about the waiting in line for an x-ray, turned into an enlightening exchange about what it means to be a middle class American. Enlightening? Yes, because in explaining it I realized that while many non-Americans think we are just "lucky" to live in a country which gives us so many economic opportunities, I realized it is not about luck at all. It is about choice. I can choose to keep a particular family value, or I can adopt my own. I can choose to buy something, or not. It struck me that this is NOT uniquely American, and many Chinese are experiencing the exact same opportunity, albeit for the first time and on a more limited scale. Parents here worry the same as our parents did/do in the U.S about evolving family values. I cannot imagine what my great grandmother would think about my daughter owning and wearing jewelry! We had to be 10 years old before she would even let us try her jewelery on! But I have made sure that Natalie kept the important values: polite, empathetic, independent. We made choices as parents and hope that our choices result in happy daughter. Hopefully Granny knows that I have been known to search for the 2RMB Chinese Cabbage occasionally!
Friday, October 8, 2010
Thought I would share the security email sent to us by our Villa's Management Office. Our compound has had a few break-ins in recent weeks. Primarly due to the fact that the National holiday was last week and people need MONEY! Anyway, I am not sure of the real Chinese translations say, but the Chinglish ones are good!
安全防范提醒
Security Precaution Notice
尊敬的租客及业主:
Dear tenants and landlord,
为了各位租客及业主的安全考虑,我们提出一些建议, 也希望各位租客及业主在维诗凯亚别墅居住愉快。
In order to ensure all tenants and landlord’s safety, we provide some suggestions, also hopes all live here happy.
1、 请关好门窗,尤其在夜间和家中无人期间, 确保所有玻璃移门及车库门锁好。
Please close all the windows, especially during the midnights and nobody at home, ensure all the sliding doors and garage door closed.
2、 建议在大门、车库通往室内的门上安装插销,确保临睡前插好插销。
Suggest install bolt in the main door and the door which can through from garage to indoor area. Ensure close all bolts before sleep.
3、 建议所有的移门安装扣锁,确保移门无法被推开。
Suggest install second locks on all the sliding doors, ensure it can not be opened.
4、 如家中安全报警系统已坏的,及时报修给业主并修理。 如外出度假的,确保一定把报警系统调试到工作状态。
If the public security system was broken, please report to your landlord and repair it timely. If you go on holiday, ensure the public security system works.
5、 建议外出度假的租客和业主,不要在家中留有贵重物品。
Suggest do not leave valuables in the house when you go on holiday.
预祝各位在维诗凯亚别墅过的愉快
Hopes everyone happy in Vizcaya
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








